Sunday, December 14, 2008

Bits of bits


For Baby S born 17 November 2008.

You can’t fully comprehend the surreal experience of the brit milah (circumcision) until you’ve been a mother of a Jewish boy. It’s one thing to hand your newborn son over to a doctor who performs circumcision out of view – quickly, efficiently and without fuss. It’s an entirely different matter when you’re expected to throw a party 8 days after birthing a baby where everyone gathers to witness the removal of your son’s foreskin over bagels and lox.

It’s tough to be proud of ritual circumcision when so many of us these days are in the business of promoting the health and safety of humankind. Motherhood has helped me become acutely aware of health issues affecting our society. I support sustainable farming. I am a natural birth advocate. We send our children to an integrative pediatrician. The last thing you’d think we’d do is allow someone to take a knife to our helpless, newborn sons and remove their foreskins for no apparent health benefits. If I weren’t Jewish, I wouldn’t do it.

Some non-Jewish friends have chosen to circumcise their sons because they want father and son to have the same equipment. Obviously, this is not an issue for us. Of course, I could make a terribly inappropriate comment about the fact that most strap-ons are molded in the shape of circumcised willies, but then I’d be implying that a) we own a strap-on and that b) our sons would ever have the opportunity to compare their willies with the alleged strap on. As I will not confirm or deny the existence of said strap-on, I choose not to make the inappropriate comment.

I can’t intellectualize circumcision for those who rally against it. If you can suspend your moralizing long enough to appreciate cultural differences and respect a ritual that is as old as dirt, you might be able to understand the significance of the event. If not, feel free to “change the channel” and skip to another entry. I won’t be engaging in a debate about circumcision, so kindly keep your judgments to yourself.

So there we were; gathered in our lounge waiting to remove Asher’s foreskin on our dining room table. Our mohel was a star. He talked about the history of the ceremony and significance of each part of the ritual. He helped everyone appreciate that they were a part of something important. He put us all at ease throughout the procedure-walking us through every step with a calming tone. If I hadn’t been such a post-birth mess, I would have actually enjoyed the experience. Gabriella, on the other hand, was more traumatized than Asher. She stood in the corner of our flat-staring out the window weeping the entire time, bless her cotton socks.

And when all was said and done, the mohel asked us, “So, what are you going to do with the foreskin?” What?!? Who knew anyone was supposed to DO anything with the foreskin? I birthed my first baby a week ago. I’m spouting milk like an open fire hydrant in the middle of August. I’m lumbering around the house in my maternity clothes and the enormous, medieval pad stuck between my legs. Sweaty. Dizzy from not eating or sleeping and being in a constant state of new-mother shock. I haven’t left my bed since we brought baby home let alone hosted a party. I don’t even like lox. And now, this guy who knows way more about the Jewish tradition of circumcision than I ever will know asks me what I’m planning to do with the foreskin.

“What are we supposed to do with it,” we ask.

“Most people bury it.” And he handed us Asher’s foreskin wrapped neatly in gauze that was sealed with surgical tape. Because we could think of no other response, we accepted the package (so to speak) and nodded indicating that we would do exactly was expected of us. We thanked him for his help and paid him an exorbitant amount of money before sending him on his way. I guess you can’t really justify shopping for bargains when you’re dealing with your child’s bits.

When the last guest had congratulated us and gone home with the left-over lox, we lay with Asher in our bed. He was fast asleep. We agreed that it went as well as could be expected and regretted not having asked anyone to take pictures. We learned our lesson the second time around and documented Levi’s bris. “And what about the foreskin?” I asked Gabriella. “I guess we need to bury it.” “Where? We live in a flat with no outside space. You don’t want to bury it with one of our plants, do you?” “No!” “Do we bury it in Highgate Woods?” “Maybe we should wait until we’re in the U.S. and bury it somewhere there.” The conversation was absurd. It was as if we were trying to figure out where to spread our ashes. We couldn’t decide what to do. And, my friends, I must confess that we still have not decided what to do. That’s right. We are still in possession of Asher’s foreskin! I know. Bonkers. Not to worry, however. It is in a secure location and out of view.

Why haven’t we buried it in our back yard here in South Orange, New Jersey? I don’t know. Maybe because we don’t yet feel like this is home. Maybe we feel the need to identify a more significant-possibly spiritual-location. Or maybe we just like to freak out friends who come for dinner when we tell them that Asher’s foreskin may have been accidentally grated into to the marinade. Now that our little secret is out and published, it might be time to literally and figuratively bury the remains of Asher’s circumcision.

Levi was born here in the U.S. Obviously, we had to employ a different mohel to conduct the bris. He was an Israeli mohel, but the bris was strictly American. He passed out refrigerator magnets marketing his services to all our guests and boasted that he had also been the mohel for Jerry Seinfeld’s son, Julian. Levi’s mohel never asked us what we planned to do with his foreskin. I’m hoping that he took it upon himself to bury it somewhere. Maybe Levi’s foreskin is buried next to Julian Seinfeld’s and a tree is growing out of the soil that is fertilized by bits of their bits. A girl can dream, can’t she?

12 comments:

Laura MacDonald said...

This story leaves me deeply sad. Why should someone so intelligent gentle and thoughtful feel the need to remove the most sensitive bit of a child's sexual bits just because it's a tradition 'as old as dirt?' Would you do the same if the tradition said do it to your daughter? What about the tradition of stoning adulterers or smiting your neighbours if they displease you? What about the tradition of keeping slaves and circumcising them too? I'm sure you can think of plenty of other traditions which you and your partner are particularly grateful have ended....

No one is asking you to intellectualise the exision of part of your child's genitals. We're asking you to simply stop
doing it. Culture in no way justifies the hurting of a child's sexual parts - or any other part of them. How could it? Rights to be protected from harm are universal and apply especially to children who are so vulnerable.

Your sons will one day ask them why they were not entitled to their human right to choose a religion or their human right to enjoy sex as nature intended it. As it is you've denied them permanently the ability to experience some sexual acts and permanently altered their sensation and function in others.

How would you feel if someone had done this to you without your consent?

Deborah said...

Laura,

Thank you for your comment. I'm sure many of my readers share your sentiments and appreciate that you have published them. I am, of course, also saddened that I have offended you and anyone else who shares your views. Regarding engaging in activities simply because they are as old as dirt, I absolutely agree with you that "a foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds".

Nothing that I am about to say will explain our choices in a way that will make them any less offensive to you, I'm afraid, but I did want to respond out of respect.

Most importantly, my partner and I do not believe that we have hurt our children. Just as we do not believe that we harm our children when we choose not to administer certain vaccines that are now required here in the U.S. and not required in the U.K., we believe that we are making educated and thoughtful choices though many here would disagree. We can all find research that will prove just about anything.

Regarding consent, all parents do things to our children without their consent. It is our responsibility as parents to do what we think is best for them-physically, emotionally and spiritually. We believe we are doing just that.

Secondly, my partner and I are Jewish before we are American or Italian or gay (though Gabriella might contend that she is equally gay and Italian). The brit milah is arguably the single most important ritual that has connected our people to a religion that has withstood hatred and violence throughout the centuries. Furthermore, Judaism for us is just as much an ethnicity as it is a religion, and our children (whether they choose to practice Judaism or any other religion in the future) will never be able to strip themselves of their heritage. We believe our sons will thank us for providing them with a solid foundation, a positive identity and a connection to a community rich in history and tradition.

I welcome additional comments on the subject though I have nothing more to add personally.

I hope you will continue to tune in and add your considered thoughts in the future.

Thanks again.

Jan said...

This was a tough one for Sam & I also. I also subscribed to the "if I weren't Jewish, I wouldn't do it" philosophy. However, we are, and we did decide ultimately to circumcize. I am glad that we did. Our sons are Jewish and will eventually (probably) grow up to be Jewish men. All religions have traditions, and some just hurt more than others (literally or figuratively). I think that there is something to be said (I'm not exactly sure what) for tradition and culture and I do not for one second regret the decision to circ our boys. The manner in which a religious circumcision takes place with a mohel is as close to pain-free as you can get, in my limited experience assisting in hospital circs.

I liked what you said, Deborah, about consenting our children. In research, informed consent for children is given by their parent under the assumption that the parent has the child's best interest in mind when consenting/not consenting them. It is true that as a parent, every day you must make decisions large and small for your children "without their consent" and I think that we all just muddle through hoping that we made more right decisions than wrong ones...

Levi is so sweet in that photo - they just grow so fast, it's painful...

Danny said...

I too am saddened that you chose to have your child circumcised. I was circumcised at birth and I have grown to be very angry about it. I just wish that something like this that will effect me for the rest of my life would have been left up to my own choice. It would be much easier for me to chose to be circumcised later that it would be for me to get back my foreskin.

Just because your child is born into a religion that has a tradition of genital mutilation does not mean that you have to continue such an awful practice. There is no way of knowing whether he will even continue to follow the religion.

In short, if he wanted to be circumcised, he can do when he is older. I wish that parents would just leave a decision like that up to their children instead of forcing it upon them like my parents did with me.

specialaffinity said...

Sex with a circumcised penis has been likened to 'trying to appreciate one of Goya's masterpieces by looking at a black and white photograph?'
Kenneth Purvis, M.D., Ph.D.
The Male Sexual Machine: An Owner's Manual, 1992



The cultural task of turning a boy into a man begins by the disruption of the primal bond between mother and her son. The implicit message given to the male when he is circumcised, whether the ritual is performed at seven days old or at puberty, is that your body henceforth belongs to the tribe and not merely yourself. What indelible message would be carved on your body, encoded within the scar tissue of your symbolic wound? That men and women who supposedly love their sons refuse to examine and stop this barbaric practice strongly suggests that something powerfully strange is going on that is obscured by a conspiracy of silence.
Sam Keen - Fire in the Belly, pp.29-30, 1991

Your sons body is not your property. You are there to take care of him - that doesn't include authorizing surgical removal of perfectly normal penile tissue. It should of been left up to him to decide, whether or not he wants
to alter his genital.

Newmie said...

wow

Alan S said...

Um, hello people. We've got global warming, economic collapse, a dearth of love and a surfeit of war and violence. And circumcision prompts outrage? Maybe all this sh*t has gone down because we've been focused so much on "little" things (and no matter how big the schwanz, foreskins are always just that). I'm circumcised and was raised Christian and am now agnostic. Do I miss my foreskin? Not as much as I miss having a president and leaders that are sensible and want to take care of this planet I call home. Besides, ain't nothin' smell as bad as an uncircumcised penis on a hot summer day. I'm just sayin....

Deborah said...

Alan S, thanks for bringing us back home. Stop sweating the little bits-literally...because it's smelly.

Anonymous said...

I am not Jewish and I had my son circumcised. I did this for many reasons which I do not feel the need to share here. I agree with Deborah in saying that we do lots of things to our kids that we don't ask permission for. Another thing: If I were to start berating the non-circ proponents for their choice, I wonder what kind of reception that'd get.

Deborah said...

anonymous, thank you for your post. respect is such an important issue when it comes to this topic. i often feel as if mothers do not respect each other enough for their choices. we should all know how much love and thought goes into every decision we make for our children.

Alex said...

It is so disgusting and sad that anyone would genitally mutilate their child this way.

By circumcising your son you have removed 70% of the nerve endings in his penis. You have removed 70% of the feeling in his penis, and the sexual pleasure he could have had--for life.

You have removed a PROTECTIVE layer of functioning tissue from his body.
The foreskin is not simply "skin". It is a healthy tissue full of nerve endings, muscle, and blood vessels. The foreskin protects the penis from abrasion, infection, disease, sexual discomfort, and helps keep it clean and lubricated.

You have put a baby through excruciating pain and trauma, thus shaping his brain development around pain and negativity. The agony and helplessness he felt will be deeply-rooted in his mind for the rest of his life. 60% of infants develop PTSD from circumcision.
Research shows that trauma in infancy, such as circumcision, effects the baby's brain, changing both their temperament and personality through childhood and adulthood. A circumcised man is more aggressive, more neurotic/anxious and easily stressed, has more trouble communicating, more trouble maintaining relationships, and struggles with his masculinity.

You can see the research for yourself:

http://knol.google.com/k/circumcision-and-human-behavior#

http://www.circumcision.org/studies.htm

http://www.doctorsopposingcircumcision.org/DOC/statement06.html

If you ever have another son, I hope you will put his well-being and happiness before your religion.

Taben said...

Please visit this site:

http://jewsagainstcircumcision.com/

Many Jewish parents have the traditional Bris naming ceremony without the circumcision. (I think it's called a Bris Hayim)

That's what my parents did, and I'm glad that they loved me enough not to let anyone cut off a body part of mine. And I'm still Jewish too :)